4P Community Safety Commissioning Framework
Commission around the outcome you need to change, not simply the service you want to buy.
Community safety commissioning is more than procurement and contract management. Decisions about public money, service design and provision shape what support exists, who can access it and what people experience when they need help.
Good commissioning therefore starts with understanding the problem, the people and communities affected, the evidence, existing provision and the difference that needs to be made.
It then requires commissioners to translate that understanding into accessible and realistic provision, clear standards and responsibilities, constructive provider relationships and meaningful approaches to quality, performance and learning.
The 4P Community Safety Commissioning Framework brings this together through four domains, each considered through the four 4P lenses: People. Practice. Prevention. Protection.
Why commissioning is different
Commissioning is an exercise in stewardship. It involves making choices about finite public resources, identifying where intervention can make the greatest difference and creating provision for people who may be experiencing vulnerability, violence, exploitation, ASB, domestic abuse, serious violence or other forms of harm.
Provision may also support:
The commissioner's responsibility therefore goes beyond checking whether contracted activity has been delivered. Good commissioning continues to ask:
A provider can deliver every contracted activity and the intended outcome can still remain unchanged.
The framework
| Community Safety Commissioning | People | Practice | Prevention | Protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understand Need & Outcomes | Understand people, communities and inequality | Use evidence to define need and required outcomes | Understand causes and opportunities for earlier intervention | Identify vulnerability, risk and gaps in provision |
| Design the Response | Design around access and people's journeys | Specify outcomes, standards, pathways and responsibilities clearly | Build prevention into service design | Define safeguarding, escalation and risk responsibilities |
| Manage Delivery & Relationships | Build constructive commissioner-provider relationships | Monitor quality, performance and contractual delivery | Test whether delivery is reducing future harm or demand | Act when quality, capacity or risk deteriorates |
| Understand Impact & Improve | Listen to people using and delivering services | Combine outputs, outcomes, quality and evidence | Understand what has genuinely been prevented | Identify gaps, unintended consequences and unresolved harm |
Understand Need & Outcomes
Design the Response
Manage Delivery & Relationships
Understand Impact & Improve
Explore the framework
Know what needs to change before deciding what to commission.
Understand local need, lived experience, demand, inequality, existing provision, gaps and the outcome that commissioning needs to influence.
Explore Need & OutcomesThe way a service is designed shapes the behaviour it produces.
Turn evidence and outcomes into accessible provision, clear pathways, meaningful standards and realistic responsibilities.
Explore Design the ResponseContract management is more than receiving a performance return.
Build effective provider relationships while maintaining clear expectations around quality, delivery, safeguarding, performance and improvement.
Explore Delivery & RelationshipsDo not stop at asking what was delivered. Ask what changed.
Bring together quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand outcomes, prevention, lived experience, quality and what future commissioning should do differently.
Explore Impact & ImprovementAudience
The framework is relevant to people involved in designing, funding, commissioning, managing or reviewing community safety provision, including:
Once provision has been commissioned, the provider is responsible for delivering the service in line with the agreed specification, standards and contractual arrangements.
But commissioning a service does not mean stepping away from the people, need or outcomes that led to the commission in the first place.
A strong commissioner-provider relationship should make it possible to speak honestly about what is working, where people may be struggling to access or benefit from provision, what is changing and where the commissioner or provider may need to respond differently. Good stewardship means remaining curious about what public investment is actually achieving, not simply whether the contract is being delivered.
4P Collective can help commissioners and community safety teams understand need, design provision, strengthen commissioner-provider relationships, review existing arrangements and use evidence to understand whether investment is producing the difference intended for people and communities.
Stay informed
Research, resources, new services and important practice developments.
